Can you trust the numbers?
- From
-
Published on
17.06.19
- Impact Area

Millions of dollars are being invested in efforts to reduce the contribution of tropical deforestation to climate change. To find out whether that money is being well-spent, decision-makers choose from a variety of ways to measure avoided deforestation. But which one can be trusted? New research has found that different methods are more accurate in different sites, depending on the local deforestation drivers and the circumstances of the country.
REDD+, the UN-backed scheme aiming to compensate developing countries for reducing deforestation and forest degradation – is now more than a decade old, and several tropical countries, including Indonesia and Brazil will receive payments for results achieved.
Since some of the early REDD+ action was at the local level – with over 300 projects still active – it is important to understand if these initiatives contributed to reducing deforestation, and by how much. But what is the best way to measure that?
A new study…
Read the rest of the story at forestsnews.org
The post Can you trust the numbers? appeared first on CIFOR Forests News.
Related news
-
In the field: Listening to Adaptation Pioneers
CGIAR Initiative on Livestock and Climate27.06.24-
Adaptation
Field days are events that bring people together. In this case, adaptation pioneers, other farmers,…
Read more -
-
Supporting sustainable livestock value chains to restore large rangelands
CGIAR Initiative on Livestock and Climate27.06.24-
Adaptation
Rangelands are critical for biodiversity, ecosystem services, and the livelihoods of millions of pas…
Read more -
-
In solidarity with refugees on World Refugee Day
CGIAR Initiative on Fragility, Conflict, and Migration27.06.24-
Climate adaptation & mitigation
-
Gender equality, youth & social inclusion
A week on from World Refugee Day, explore IWMI's work to support refugees and refugee…
Read more -