Can you trust the numbers?
- From
-
Published on
17.06.19
- Impact Area
Millions of dollars are being invested in efforts to reduce the contribution of tropical deforestation to climate change. To find out whether that money is being well-spent, decision-makers choose from a variety of ways to measure avoided deforestation. But which one can be trusted? New research has found that different methods are more accurate in different sites, depending on the local deforestation drivers and the circumstances of the country.
REDD+, the UN-backed scheme aiming to compensate developing countries for reducing deforestation and forest degradation – is now more than a decade old, and several tropical countries, including Indonesia and Brazil will receive payments for results achieved.
Since some of the early REDD+ action was at the local level – with over 300 projects still active – it is important to understand if these initiatives contributed to reducing deforestation, and by how much. But what is the best way to measure that?
A new study…
Read the rest of the story at forestsnews.org
The post Can you trust the numbers? appeared first on CIFOR Forests News.
Related news
-
Mapping for Resilience: How Spatial Data is Transforming Karamoja Cluster
Ibukun Taiwo02.07.25-
Climate adaptation & mitigation
Pastoral communities in the Karamoja Cluster (a region spanning Kenya, Uganda, South Sudan, and Ethi…
Read more -
-
Building Resilience and Regeneration: The Central Highlands Ecoregion Foodscape (CHEF)
Sehlule Muzata02.07.25-
Climate adaptation & mitigation
At the CGIAR Sustainable Farming Program (SFP), we believe that collaboration is essential for trans…
Read more -
-
Planting with Precision: How Weather and Climate Information is Changing Bean Farming in Rwanda
The Alliance of Bioversity International and the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT)01.07.25-
Climate adaptation & mitigation
Imagine weather information as a GPS for farmers. Without it, the journey becomes uncertain, filled…
Read more -