Where REDD+ money goes – and doesn’t go
- From
-
Published on
05.06.18
- Impact Area

REDD+ financing’s annual average of USD 323 million might sound like a lot on its own, but compare this to the 41 billion spent on agricultural subsidies and biofuel, and it’s just a drop in the bucket.
This is one of many findings elucidated in a forthcoming study on funding for reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+). The study was led by the international consulting group COWI, along with the Öko-Institut and scientists from the Center for the International Forestry Research (CIFOR). The team studied REDD+ funding from 2008–2015 to see where it went and how it was spent. Read the full story on Forests News.
Related news
-
Custodians of rare mango trees aim to increase returns for spice produced from fruit
CGIAR Initiative on Nature-Positive Solutions25.06.24-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
Amchur, a spice made from unripe mangos, has high potential to increase incomes for tribal…
Read more -
-
The Nation: Why we need to invest in sustainable food systems
CGIAR24.06.24-
Nutrition, health & food security
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
Imagine going to your local market and finding empty shelves or skyrocketing prices for basic…
Read more -
-
Foresight Initiative series: What do we know about the future of food systems?
CGIAR Initiative on Foresight22.06.24-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
Food, land, and water systems face daunting challenges in the future, and the body of…
Read more -