The research-practitioner divide: why we are still optimistic
- From
-
Published on
16.04.19
- Impact Area
-
Funders
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, United States of America

Researchers and development practitioners don’t often team up to co-lead large global projects for a number of reasons. They have different audiences, timelines, and motivations, making collaboration, let alone co-management, challenging. Researchers tend to design and test innovations and work at the global level with a long-term perspective. Practitioners, on the other hand, tend to scale innovations, work on local livelihood improvements, and focus on the present. But even though this type of partnership isn’t very common, we each need the other to be able to solve seemingly intractable global problems like hunger and poverty.
Photo: Marc Charles Wanume
Related news
-
Are rice systems sustainable in Sri Lanka? – A case of Deduru Oya reservoir irrigation scheme
International Rice Research Institute (IRRI)23.06.24-
Food security
Paddy cultivation is significant in Sri Lanka, as 15% of the country’s land is dedicated…
Read more -
-
IRRI joins forces with Vietnam Seed Corporation to develop premium rice varieties
International Rice Research Institute (IRRI)18.06.24-
Food security
In a bid to improve Vietnam's rice production, Vinaseed, the country's leading seed company, joined…
Read more -
-
WEBINAR: Urban and city region food systems: bridging gaps between government levels
CGIAR Initiative on Resilient Cities12.06.24-
Climate adaptation & mitigation
-
Food security
-
Nutrition, health & food security
…
Read more -